AIStackWatch
Back to wiki

Inference Providers Compared

An inference provider hosts open-weight LLMs (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen, Mistral, and their fine-tunes) and exposes them through an OpenAI-compatible API. You get elastic capacity, pay per token, and avoid the capex and ops of GPU fleets.

Why use one instead of a frontier API

  • Open weights. You can move to a different provider — or to your own metal — if prices or latency change.
  • Cheaper for narrow tasks. An 8B or 70B open model fine-tuned for your classification job often beats a frontier-priced call.
  • Speed. Speculative decoding and custom kernels from Together and Fireworks frequently outpace provider-hosted equivalents.
  • Customization. Host your own LoRA adapter; call it through the same API.

What varies between providers

  • Model catalog. How fast do they ship the latest Llama/DeepSeek/Qwen release? Usually hours to days for the big two.
  • Per-token price. Shop around — 2-3x differences are common for the same model.
  • Tokens/sec and TTFT. Measured independently, not just spec-sheet numbers.
  • Batch endpoints. If you have async workloads, cheaper batched APIs matter a lot.
  • Fine-tune support. Together and Fireworks both host LoRA adapters; some competitors do not.

The main players

  • Together AI — broad model catalog, strong fine-tuning, competitive latency.
  • Fireworks AI — focus on speed and throughput; their own inference engine.
  • Groq, Cerebras, SambaNova — specialty silicon; extremely fast TTFT on supported models but a narrower catalog.
  • DeepInfra, Replicate — long tail of models; latency and reliability vary.

Failure modes

  • Quiet quantization. Some providers serve fp8 or int4 quantized versions without being loud about it. Output quality shifts. Check the model spec.
  • Cold starts. Rare or just-deployed models may have multi-second TTFT on the first request. Warm with a scheduled ping.
  • Rate-limit cliffs. Free tier stops working at 7 pm on launch day. Pay for a committed tier before you need it.

When NOT to use one

  • Frontier capability needed. GPT-5, Claude Opus, Gemini Ultra have no open equivalent at parity yet. Use them directly.
  • Regulated data. If SOC2/HIPAA/data-residency matters more than price, a frontier provider with a signed DPA is often simpler than vetting a newer inference company.